Onasanya’s Lawyer Alleges Media Trial in Loan Controversy: Demands Court Summons
Dr. Bisi Onasanya, the former Group Managing Director of FirstBank, found himself at the center of a storm as he defended himself against a controversial loan that allegedly took place at First Bank 12 years ago. Onasanya, a chartered accountant, along with three others, namely former Chairman of the bank, Chief Oba Otudeko, a former board member of Honeywell, Soji Akintayo, and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Ltd, faced accusations that have gripped the media and public attention.
Undue Exposure to Media Trial
During a session at the Federal High Court in Lagos, Onasanya’s lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, SAN, raised concerns over what he termed as a “media trial” that his client had been subjected to without formal notification. Olumide-Fusika expressed dismay at the news stories linking Dr. Onasanya to a trial on the loan controversy, highlighting a procedural anomaly that he believed undermined his client’s right to a fair hearing and personal dignity. The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, denied the EFCC’s involvement in the media coverage of the case, suggesting that journalists might have obtained information through alternative means.
Legal Battle Unfolds in Court
Olumide-Fusika opposed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service, emphasizing that his client had always been available and had not evaded service. He passionately argued for the court to have the EFCC serve the charge and the proof of evidence openly, stating that the claims made by the prosecution were baseless. Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke presiding over the case dismissed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service on Onasanya, ordering that the charge and proof of evidence be served in open court.
Ready to Defend His Name
As the case unfolded, Olumide-Fusika confirmed the receipt of the document and sought confirmation from the prosecution counsel that the proof of evidence submitted was exhaustive with no addendum. He insisted that his client was prepared to defend himself and clear his name, demonstrating a fierce determination to fight the allegations. Justice Aneke adjourned the case to February 13, 2025, setting the stage for a legal battle that promises to unravel the truth behind the loan controversy that has captured the nation’s attention.
With the legal drama unfolding in the courtroom, Dr. Onasanya’s plight serves as a stark reminder of the power of media trials and their potential impact on an individual’s right to a fair hearing. As we await the next chapter in this gripping saga, it raises critical questions about the intersection of media coverage and the legal process. How can we ensure that individuals are not prematurely judged in the court of public opinion before their day in court? This case underscores the importance of upholding the principles of justice and due process, safeguarding the rights of every individual embroiled in legal battles. Let us reflect on the implications of media trials and the need to balance freedom of the press with the right to a fair trial, as Dr. Onasanya fights to clear his name amidst a storm of controversy.
