slow-prosecution-of-election-offences-necs-challenge-solutions

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is facing challenges in the slow prosecution of electoral offenses, according to statements made by INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, during a recent meeting with the media in Abuja. Yakubu highlighted that one of the major obstacles to the swift dispensation of justice is the lack of time limits for handling electoral offenses, unlike post-election offenses that go through tribunals. This issue, coupled with the low priority given to these cases, results in delays that lead to some cases being carried over from one general election to the next.

In recent days, there have been significant judicial and legislative actions taken to address offenses involving INEC officials responsible for specific tasks. The successful prosecution of a Returning Officer in Akwa Ibom State from the 2019 General Election is an example that demonstrates the challenges faced in dealing with electoral offenses. It took nearly six years to achieve a successful prosecution in this particular case.

Collaboration with Legal Bodies

Through collaborations with organizations like the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), INEC has been actively pursuing cases involving 774 alleged offenders from the 2023 General Election. Successful prosecutions have already been achieved in Kebbi and Kogi states, with joint efforts with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) leading to positive outcomes in addressing vote-buying in Lagos, Kwara, and Gombe states. Despite these successes, many cases are still pending, indicating the ongoing challenges in the prosecution of electoral offenses.

Yakubu emphasized the need for the creation of an Electoral Offenses Tribunal with specific jurisdiction and a limited timeframe to ensure the speedy resolution of cases. Currently, electoral offenses are handled by the Magistrate and State High Courts where the offenses occurred, without receiving prioritized attention. This lack of focus, combined with the courts’ heavy caseloads, contributes to the carryover of electoral offense cases between general elections, hindering efficient prosecution.

Media Advocacy for Electoral Democracy

In light of these challenges, Yakubu called upon the media to join in advocating for the establishment of an Electoral Offenses Tribunal to enhance the integrity of the nation’s electoral democracy. By raising awareness and highlighting the importance of addressing electoral offenses promptly and effectively, the media can play a crucial role in supporting INEC’s efforts to ensure accountability and transparency in the electoral process.

As the slow prosecution of electoral offenses continues to be a significant issue affecting the integrity of Nigeria’s elections, collaborative efforts between INEC, legal bodies, and the media are essential in addressing these challenges. By working together to advocate for the establishment of specialized tribunals and prioritizing the resolution of electoral offenses, stakeholders can contribute to strengthening the country’s electoral system and upholding the principles of fairness and justice in the democratic process.